|Survivors Give Personal Accounts of Bloody Day in 1989 & Their Hopes for a Free China in Future
Washington, May 30 | Jeff Sagnip ((202) 225-3765) Congressman Chris Smith Office
Survivors of the bloody 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre-when the Chinese government unleashed tanks and bullets on unarmed and peaceful demonstrators-told their grim accounts of that fateful day and about their hopes and work for a better future for China’s people at a congressional hearing today held by Chairman Chris Smith (NJ-04), head of the global human rights subcommittee in the House of Representatives, and co-chairman of the bipartisan U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China.
“Twenty-five years ago, the world watched as students from Beijing’s Central Academy of Fine Arts unveiled the replica of the Statute of Liberty in Tiananmen Square,” Smith said. “It was an amazing sight to behold, this enduring symbol of liberty standing face-to-face with the dictator Mao Zedong’s portrait.”
“It was a moment when we all dreamed that the Tiananmen Square demonstrations would become a triumph for freedom and democracy. Unfortunately, China’s Communist leaders sought to hang on to power through force. They sent tanks and soldiers into Beijing to “clear the Square” on the evening of June 3rd and June 4th. The beating, the bayonetting, torture, and murder of students and the ubiquitous display of tanks turned the dream of freedom into a bloody nightmare. Click here to read Chairman Smith’s opening statement.
The Tiananmen witnesses were:
Chai Ling, Founder, All Girls Allowed. Chai was a student leader in the 1989 Tiananmen Square movement. She has previously been named Glamour Woman of the Year and nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize. She serves as the Founding President and Chief Operating Officer of Jenzabar, Inc., a higher education software and services provider. She holds an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, an M.L.A. in Public Affairs from Princeton University, and a B.A. from Peking University.
Dr. Yang Jianli, Ph.D., President, Initiatives for China. A Tiananmen Massacre Survivor and former political prisoner of China (2002-2007), Dr. Yyang is a major leader of the Chinese Democracy Movement. He is the founder of Initiatives for China/Citizen Power for China and Foundation for China in the 21st Century, and the founder and organizer of China E Weekly. He co-authored a Democratic Constitution for China (1993) and co-Chaired The Geneva Internet Freedom Declaration (2010). A recipient of multiple international awards including the Harvard Alumni Achievement Award and the U.N. Watch Human Rights Award, Yang was elected to the Top 100 Chinese Public Intellectuals of 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
U.S. Army Capt. Yan Xiong, a Tiananmen massacre witness and survivor, he was one of the student leaders who initiated the 1989 Tiananmen Democratic Movement as a chairman of Beijing University Students Independent Council. He was on the Chinese government’s “Twenty-one Most Wanted List” of student leaders. His involvement at Tiananmen Square led to his arrest and imprisonment at Qin Cheng for 19 months. He came to the United States as a political refugee in 1992. He was elected as the Chairman of the Party of Freedom and Democracy of China of the Second Party Representative Conference from 1992 to 1995. He joined U.S. Army in 1994 and was commissioned in 2003. He was deployed to Iraq for a year.
Zhou Fengsuo, Co-Founder, Humanitarian China, key student leader organizing the 1989 democratic movement in Tiananmen Square. He was the fifth on the twenty-one most wanted list of student leaders. After the Tiananmen massacre he spent one year in prison.
Chen Qinglin, an activist in Tiananmen Square and was imprisoned for several years in the 1990s for his efforts in attempting to form an opposition party in the wake of the massacre. He was one of the first 303 signatories of “Charter 08.” In 2010 he led a program of psychological support for domestic human rights defenders who have been tortured by the government. Newly arrived in U.S. in April 2014.
Opening Remarks by Dr.YANG Jianli at the hearing of the Committee on Foreign Affairs held by the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations on the Topic “Tiananmen 25 Years Later: Leaders Who Were There”.
May 30, 2014
Thank you very much for hosting this timely hearing.
If I remember correctly, this is the 15th hearing you have hosted on human rights in China. Your leadership is remarkable. The statements you and other members just made have made clear once again that we have not been fighting alone. Today I will not repeat myself on my personal account of the Tiananmen Massacre 25 years ago, which I have testified multiple times before you; instead, I will try to provide you a window through which you may better see the overall political situation in China and the direction it is taking.
25 years ago, the Chinese students and citizens in Beijing and across China demanded a clean government and freedom of expression and media, but today the conditions in these areas are much worse than before in may ways.
For example, when the new leadership led by Xi Jinping took power in 2013, it issued a secret Document 9 which boils down to this, I quote：
“We must not permit the dissemination of opinions that oppose the Party’s theory or political line, the publication of views contrary to decisions that represent the central leadership’s views, or the spread of political rumors that defame the image of the Party or the nation.”
it sounds like something from the Dark Ages. But it is happening today, in China. China has now fallen into its own Dark Age. Not only has the party-state started a systematic, mafia-style campaign to silence any dissenting voice by physically removing pro-democracy and human rights activists through massive arrests, forced disappearance, severe sentences, but more seriously it has launched an even bigger campaign to control the Chinese people’s mind.
The Chinese party-state openly denounces the American and western values and political system which we all cherish, and vows to eradicate the so-called “seven perils” that endanger the party-state’s perpetual rule of China, including western constitutional democracy, universal values of human rights, independent press and civil society, pro-market “neo-liberalism” and a few others.
This campaign to completely reject “Western ideas” is actually an essential part of Xi’s “Chinese dream.” It is much worse and farther reaching than the anti-bourgeois spiritual pollution campaign during the mid of 1980s which the students in Tiananmen Square demanded to overturn 25 years ago.
Mr. Chairman, I have to sadly report to you that two activists have been detained and charged with leaking this infamous Document 9. They are Ms. Gao Yu, whom you may already know, and a gentleman, an author of several influential books and the highest ranking official detained in this round of crackdowns.
There was a chance for political reform and peaceful transition to democracy within the Chinese Communist Party in 1989, but with Xi’s total rejection of universal value and democracy and his denial of free thought, the opportunity is now gone. The key question that the United States must ask is, can a fascist party-state that ruthlessly kills its own people and continues to silence any opposition voice, and ban people’s intellectual freedom, can it rise peacefully? What danger does it pose to our society and universal values?
Finally, I ask to summit the Document 9 for the record. Thank you Mr. Chairman.
Communiqué on the Current State of the Ideological Sphere
A Notice from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China’s General Office
Provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Party committee, Central ministries and state organs, Party ministries, People’s Liberation Army headquarters, major Party committees, and Party leadership groups of civilian organizations: This notice “A Communiqué on the Current State of the Ideological Sphere” has been approved by the central leadership, and is herewith distributed to you. Please thoroughly implement its suggestions.
April 22, 2013
(This document has been sent to local divisional levels)
Since the Party’s Eighteenth National Congress, under General Secretary Xi Jinping’s strong central leadership, the nation triumphantly convened the National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, the Party’s and nation’s various undertakings have made a good start, and the general mood of the Party and Government has been constantly improving. Cohesion among our nation’s people has become stronger and our confidence in our path, our theory, and our system has become more resolute. Mainstream ideology is becoming healthier and more vigorous. The spirit of the Party’s Eighteenth National Congress and General Secretary Xi Jinping’s series of important speeches have unified the thought of the entire Party, the entire country, and the entire people enormously. The ideological foundation of our united struggle is unceasingly solidifying.
The new session of the central leadership group has: put forth a series of new principles for conduct in political administration, furnished an interpretation of the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, improved our work-style, maintained close ties with the masses, rigorously enforced diligence and thrift, opposed extravagance and waste, increased vigor in the fight against corruption, and won the widespread endorsement of cadres and the masses. We persist in upholding scientific development as the main theme, accelerating economic transformation as the main thread, and increasing the quality and efficiency of the economy as the core. The outlook for our nation’s economic development continues to be favorable, and the people’s faith in China’s economic prospects has risen. In an effort to improve the people’s livelihood, we are putting forth new measures to benefit the people so they may look forward to a better future: disseminating thought on the cultural front as the most important political task; studying, implementing, and advancing the spirit of the Eighteenth Party Congress; rapidly arousing mass fervor, proclaiming that socialism with Chinese characteristics and the Chinese dream are the main theme of our age; expanding and strengthening positive propaganda; strengthening guidance on deep-seated problems; strengthening the management of ideological fronts; promoting unification of thought; concentrating our strength and implementing the development of a positive atmosphere and providing spiritual strength to the party and nation.
Noteworthy Problems Related to the Current State of the Ideological Sphere
While fully approving of the ideological mainstream, we must also clearly see the ideological situation as a complicated, intense struggle. Currently, the following false ideological trends, positions, and activities all deserve note:
1. Promoting Western Constitutional Democracy: An attempt to undermine the current leadership and the socialism with Chinese characteristics system of governance.
Western Constitutional Democracy has distinct political properties and aims. Among these are the separation of powers, the multi-party system, general elections, independent judiciaries, nationalized armies, and other characteristics. These are the capitalist class’ concepts of a nation, political model, and system design. The concept of constitutional democracy originated a long time ago, and recently the idea has been hyped ever more frequently.
This is mainly expressed the following ways: In commemorating the thirtieth anniversary of the enactment of the [Chinese] Constitution, [some people] hold up the banners of “defending the constitution” and “rule of law.” They attack the Party’s leaders for placing themselves above the constitution, saying China “has a constitution but no constitutional government.” Some people still use the phrase “constitutional dream” to distort the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, saying things like “constitutional democracy is the only way out” and “China should catch up with the rest of the world’s trend toward constitutional governance.” The point of publicly proclaiming Western constitutional democracy’s key points is to oppose the party’s leadership and implementation of its constitution and laws. Their goal is to use Western constitutional democracy to undermine the Party’s leadership, abolish the People’s Democracy, negate our country’s constitution as well as our established system and principles, and bring about a change of allegiance by bringing Western political systems to China.
2. Promoting “universal values” in an attempt to weaken the theoretical foundations of the Party’s leadership.
The goal of espousing “universal values” is to claim that the West’s value system defies time and space, transcends nation and class, and applies to all humanity.
This is mainly expressed in the following ways: [The people who espouse universal values] believe Western freedom, democracy, and human rights are universal and eternal. This is evident in their distortion of the Party’s own promotion of democracy, freedom, equality, justice, rule of law, and other such values; their claim that the CCP’s acceptance of universal values is a victory for universal values,” that “the West’s values are the prevailing norm for all human civilization,” that “only when China accepts Western values will it have a future,” and that “Reform and Opening is just a process of gradually accepting universal rights.”
Given Western nations’ long-term dominance in the realms of economics, military affairs, science, and technology, these arguments can be confusing and deceptive. The goal [of such slogans] is to obscure the essential differences between the West’s value system and the value system we advocate, ultimately using the West’s value systems to supplant the core values of Socialism.
3. Promoting civil society in an attempt to dismantle the ruling party’s social foundation.
Civil society is a socio-political theory that originated in the West. It holds that in the social sphere, individual rights are paramount and ought to be immune to obstruction by the state. For the past few years, the idea of civil society has been adopted by Western anti-China forces and used as a political tool. Additionally, some people with ulterior motives within China have begun to promote these ideas.
This is mainly expressed in the following ways:
Promoting civil society and Western-style theories of governance, they claim that building a civil society in China is a precondition for the protection of individual rights and forms the basis for the realization of constitutional democracy. Viewing civil society as a magic bullet for advancing social management at the local level, they have launched all kinds of so-called citizen’s movements.
Advocates of civil society want to squeeze the Party out of leadership of the masses at the local level, even setting the Party against the masses, to the point that their advocacy is becoming a serious form of political opposition.
4. Promoting Neoliberalism, attempting to change China’s Basic Economic System.
Neoliberalism advocates unrestrained economic liberalization, complete privatization, and total marketization and it opposes any kind of interference or regulation by the state. Western countries, led by the United States, carry out their Neoliberal agendas under the guise of “globalization,” visiting catastrophic consequences upon Latin America, the Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe, and have also dragged themselves into the international financial crisis from they have yet to recover.
This is mainly expressed in the following ways:
[Neoliberalism’s advocates] actively promote the “market omnipotence theory.” They claim our country’s macroeconomic control is strangling the market’s efficiency and vitality and they oppose public ownership, arguing that China’s state-owned enterprises are “national monopolies,” inefficient, and disruptive of the market economy, and should undergo “comprehensive privatization.” These arguments aim to change our country’s basic economic infrastructure and weaken the government’s control of the national economy.
5. Promoting the West’s idea of journalism, challenging China’s principle that the media and publishing system should be subject to Party discipline.
Some people, under the pretext of espousing “freedom of the press,” promote the West’s idea of journalism and undermine our country’s principle that the media should be infused with the spirit of the Party.
This is mainly expressed in the following ways:
Defining the media as “society’s public instrument” and as the “Fourth Estate;” attacking the Marxist view of news and promote the “free flow of information on the Internet;” slandering our country’s efforts to improve Internet management by calling them a crackdown on the Internet; claiming that the media is not governed by the rule of law but by the arbitrary will of the leadership; and calling for China to promulgate a Media Law based on Western principles. [Some people] also claim that China restricts freedom of the press and bang on about abolishing propaganda departments. The ultimate goal of advocating the West’s view of the media is to hawk the principle of abstract and absolute freedom of press, oppose the Party’s leadership in the media, and gouge an opening through which to infiltrate our ideology.
6. Promoting historical nihilism, trying to undermine the history of the CCP and of New China.
The goal of historical nihilism, in the guise of “reassessing history,” is to distort Party history and the history of New China.
This is mainly expressed in the following ways:
Rejecting the revolution; claiming that the revolution led by the Chinese Communist Party resulted only in destruction; denying the historical inevitability in China’s choice of the Socialist road, calling it the wrong path, and the Party’s and new China’s history a “continuous series of mistakes”; rejecting the accepted conclusions on historical events and figures, disparaging our Revolutionary precursors, and vilifying the Party’s leaders. Recently, some people took advantage of Comrade Mao Zedong’s 120th birthday in order to deny the scientific and guiding value of Mao Zedong thought. Some people try to cleave apart the period that preceded Reform and Opening from the period that followed, or even to set these two periods in opposition to one another. By rejecting CCP history and the history of New China, historical nihilism seeks to fundamentally undermine the CCP’s historical purpose, which is tantamount to denying the legitimacy of the CCP’s long-term political dominance.
7. Questioning Reform and Opening and the socialist nature of socialism with Chinese characteristics.
For the past several years, the discussion of reform has been unceasing, with all kinds of voices joining one after another. Some views clearly deviate from socialism with Chinese characteristics.
This is mainly expressed in the following ways:
Some blame the contradictions and problems of development on Reform and Opening. They say “Reform and opening up has gone too far” and that “we have deviated from our Socialist orientation.” They question whether or not what China is doing now still truly is Socialism, or they just call it “Capitalist Socialism,” “State Capitalism,” or “New Bureaucratic Capitalism.” Others say “reform is still distant and hasn’t be realized” or that “reform of the political system lags behind and obstructs reform of the economy.” They bang on about how we should use Western standards to achieve so-called “thorough reform.” Essentially, they oppose the general and specific policies emanating from the road taken at the Third Plenum of the Eleventh Party Congress and they oppose socialism with Chinese characteristics.
These mistaken views and ideas exist in great numbers in overseas media and reactionary publications. They penetrate China through the Internet and underground channels and they are disseminated on domestic Internet forums, blogs, and microblogs, They also appear in public lectures, seminars, university classrooms, class discussion forums, civilian study groups, and individual publications. If we allow any of these ideas to spread, they will disturb people’s existing consensus on important issues like which flag to raise, which road to take, which goals to pursue, etc., and this will disrupt our nation’s stable progress on reform and development.
Western anti-China forces and internal “dissidents” are still actively trying to infiltrate China’s ideological sphere and challenge our mainstream ideology. Some of their latest major efforts include: Some people have disseminated open letters and declarations and have organized petition-signings to vocalize requests for political reforms, improvement of human rights, release of “political prisoners,” “reversing the verdict on ‘6/4′[the Tiananmen Massacre],” and other such political demands; they have made a fuss over asset disclosure by officials, fighting corruption with the Internet, media supervision of government, and other sensitive hot-button issues, all of which stoke dissatisfaction with the Party and government. Western embassies, consulates, media operations, and NGOs operating inside China under various covers are spreading Western ideas and values and are cultivating so-called “anti-government forces.” Cooking up anti-government publications overseas. Within China’s borders, some private organizations are creating reactionary underground publications, and still others are filming documentaries on sensitive subject matter, disseminating political rumors, and defaming the party and the national leadership. Those manipulating and hyping the Tibetan self-immolations, manufacturing the violent terrorist attacks in Xinjiang, and using the ethnic and religious issues to divide and break up [the nation]. Accelerating infiltration of the Internet and illegal gatherings within our borders. “Dissidents” and people identified with “rights protection” are active. Some of them are working together with Western anti-China forces, echoing each other and relying on each other’s support. This clearly indicates that the contest between infiltration and anti-infiltration efforts in the ideological sphere is as severe as ever, and so long as we persist in CCP leadership and socialism with Chinese characteristics, the position of Western anti-China forces to pressure for urgent reform won’t change, and they’ll continue to point the spearhead of Westernizing, splitting, and “Color Revolutions” at China. In the face of these threats, we must not let down our guard or decrease our vigilance.
Pay Close Attention to Work in the Ideological Sphere.
Historical experience has proven that failures in the economic sphere can result in major disorder, and failure in the ideological sphere can result in major disorders as well. Confronting the very real threat of Western anti-China forces and their attempt at carrying out Westernization, splitting, and “Color Revolutions,” and facing the severe challenge of today’s ideological sphere, all levels of Party and Government, especially key leaders, must pay close attention to their work in the ideological sphere and firmly seize their leadership authority and dominance.
1. Strengthen leadership in the ideological sphere.
Party members and governments of all levels must become fully aware that struggles in the ideological sphere are perpetual, complex, and excruciating; you must strengthen awareness of the current political situation, big picture, responsibility, and risks. Leaders at all levels of government, you must strengthen your sense of responsibility-make work in the ideological sphere a high priority in your daily agenda, routinely analyze and study new developments in the ideological sphere, react swiftly and effectively, and preemptively resolve all problems in the ideological sphere.
2. Guide our party member and leaders to distinguish between true and false theories.
Forcefully resist influential and harmful false tides of thoughts, help people distinguish between truth and falsehood, and solidify their understanding. Party members, especially high-level leaders, must become adept at tackling problems from political, big-picture, strategic, and theoretical perspective. They must clearly recognize the essence of false ideas and viewpoints, both their theoretical falsehood and the practical political harm they can cause. We must have a firm approach and clear-cut stance toward major political principles, issues of right and wrong, what to support and what to oppose. We must uphold strict and clear discipline, maintaining a high-level unity with the Party Central Committee under the leadership of General Secretary Xi Jinping in thought, political stance, and action. We must not permit the dissemination of opinions that oppose the Party’s theory or political line, the publication of views contrary to decisions that represent the central leadership’s views, or the spread of political rumors that defame the image of the Party or the nation.
3. Unwavering adherence to the principle of the Party’s control of media.
The [principle of the Party’s control of media] stems from our political system and the nature of our media. We must maintain the correct political direction. We must firmly hold fast to the principle of the media’s Party spirit and social responsibility, and that in political matters it must be of one heart and mind with the Party. We must persist in correct guidance of public opinion, insisting that the correct political orientation suffuse every domain and process in political engagement, form, substance, and technology. We must give high priority to building both the leadership and rank and file in the sphere of media work. We need to strengthen education on the Marxist perspective of media to ensure that the media leadership is always firmly controlled by someone who maintains an identical ideology with the Party’s Central Committee, under General Secretary Xi Jinping’s leadership.
4. Conscientiously strengthen management of the ideological battlefield.
When facing sensitive events and complex puzzles in the ideological sphere, we should implement the principle that the people in charge assume responsibility and use territorial management.
We must reinforce our management of all types and levels of propaganda on the cultural front, perfect and carry out related administrative systems, and allow absolutely no opportunity or outlets for incorrect thinking or viewpoints to spread. Conscientiously implement the “Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Strengthening Information Protection on Networks,” strengthen guidance of public opinion on the Internet, purify the environment of public opinion on the Internet. Improve and innovate our management strategies and methods to achieve our goals in a legal, scientific, and effective way.